SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR INTRODUCING THE COURSE “THE IMAGE OF KAZAKHSTAN IN WORLD LITERATURE OF THE ХХ-ХХІ CENTURIES” INTO THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2026-5-1-114-127Keywords:
image of Kazakhstan, world literature of the ХХ-ХХІ centuries, cultural myth, discourse of representation, pedagogical experiment, philological education, intercultural communicationAbstract
The article provides scientific and practical justification for introducing the course “The Image of Kazakhstan in World Literature of the ХХ-ХХІ Centuries” into the educational process and evaluates its pedagogical effectiveness for students in the “Russian Language and Literature” program. The study is relevant because philologists need to critically understand both foreign and local images of the country in global communication. They must resist stereotypes and support open dialogue about national culture. Aim is to assess the course’s impact on developing students’ imagological competence, discourse analysis skills, and intercultural empathy. Methodology integrates imagological and comparative literary approaches with a pedagogical experiment and statistical analysis. The experiment involved 126 students and an original curriculum focused on literary works, travelogues, and media representations of Kazakhstan. Results showed significant improvement: understanding of auto-image and hetero-image increased from 12% to 74%; ability to detect exotization rose from 10% to 78%; and critical evaluation of media images improved from 14% to 76%. A strong correlation was found between mastery of theoretical material and critical thinking development (r = 0.71). The course modernized literature teaching, strengthened research engagement, and enhanced media literacy. Study concludes that the discipline should be included in the mandatory component of philological and teacher education programs, as it develops professionally significant competencies for working with regional material and national context. Its practical value lies in the potential replication of the model in other universities and the creation of interdisciplinary platforms for studying the Kazakhstani text within the global cultural space.
References
References
Abisheva, S., Sabirova, D., & Atembaeva, G. (2025). Klassifikacija form vyrazhenija transmedial'noj i hudozhestvennoj reprezentacii Kazahstana v mire [Classification of forms of transmedial and artistic representation of Kazakhstan in the world]. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Keruen”, 86(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2025.1-01 (in Russ)
Anderson, B. (2001). Voobrazhaemye soobshhestva: Razmyshlenija ob istokah i rasprostranenii nacionalizma [Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism]. Kanon-Press. (in Russ)
Aubakirova, Zh. A. (2021). Obraz Kazahstana v anglojazychnom trevel-diskurse [The image of Kazakhstan in English-language travel discourse]. Vestnik KazNU. Serija filologicheskaja, (2), 112-123 (in Russ)
Bart, R. (2008). Mifologii [Mythologies]. Akademicheskij proekt (in Russ)
Beller, M., & Leerssen, J. (2007). Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. Rodopi (in Eng)
Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books (in Eng)
Eleukenov, Sh. (2005). Obraz stepi v kazahskoj literature [The image of the steppe in Kazakh literature]. Kazakh universiteti (in Russ)
Fuko, M. (2002). Porjadok diskursa [The order of discourse]. Kanon+ (in Russ)
Ismakova, A. S. (2015). Kazahskaja proza i problemy nacional'noj identichnosti [Kazakh prose and the problems of national identity]. Kazakh universiteti (in Russ)
Kaskabasov, S. (2010). Pojetika kazahskogo fol'klora [Poetics of Kazakh folklore]. Elorda (in Russ)
Leerssen, J. (2010). Imagologija: istorija i metodologija issledovanija nacional'nyh obrazov [Imagology: History and methodology of the study of national images]. In Sravnitel'noe literaturovedenie, pp. 45-68. (in Russ)
Nurlanova, K. (1993). Simvolika mira v tradicionnoj kul'ture kazahov [World symbolism in the traditional culture of the Kazakhs]. Gylym (in Russ)
Said, E. (2006). Orientalizm [Orientalism]. Russkij mir (in Russ)
Shalabaeva, G. K. (2018). Nacional'naja identichnost' i kul'turnaja pamjat' Kazahstana [National identity and cultural memory of Kazakhstan]. Dajk-Press (in Russ)
Wolff, L. (2003). Izobretaja Vostochnuju Evropu [Inventing Eastern Europe] NLO. (in Russ)
Список использованной литературы
Абишева, С., Сабирова, Д., & Атембаева, Г. (2025). Классификация форм выражения трансмедиальной и художественной репрезентации Казахстана в мире. Keruen, 86(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2025.1-01
Андерсон, Б. (2001). Воображаемые сообщества: Размышления об истоках и распространении национализма. Канон-Пресс.
Аубакирова, Ж. А. (2021). Образ Казахстана в англоязычном тревел-дискурсе. Вестник КазНУ. Серия филологическая, (2), 112-123.
Барт, Р. (2008). Мифологии. Академический проект.
Вульф, Л. (2003). Изобретая Восточную Европу. НЛО.
Елеукенов, Ш. (2005). Образ степи в казахской литературе. Қазақ университеті.
Исмакова, А. С. (2015). Казахская проза и проблемы национальной идентичности. Қазақ университеті.
Каскабасов, С. (2010). Поэтика казахского фольклора. Елорда.
Леерссен, Й. (2010). Имагология: история и методология исследования национальных образов. В Сравнительное литературоведение, С. 45-68.
Нурланова, К. (1993). Символика мира в традиционной культуре казахов. Ғылым.
Саид, Э. (2006). Ориентализм. Русский мир.
Фуко, М. (2002). Порядок дискурса. Канон+.
Шалабаева, Г. К. (2018). Национальная идентичность и культурная память Казахстана. Дайк-Пресс.
Beller, M., & Leerssen, J. (Eds.). (2007). Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters. Rodopi.
Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 С.Д. Абишева, Д.А. Сабирова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en