BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ONOMASTICS: THEMATIC AREAS AND RESEARCH DYNAMICS (2005-2025

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2026-5-1-88-103

Keywords:

onomastics, bibliometric analysis, Scopus database, thematic clusters, publication dynamics, interdisciplinary research

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the dynamics, structure, and main thematic areas of the development of scientific research in the field of onomastics by conducting a bibliometric analysis of works published in the Scopus database. Of the 1,915 documents originally identified in the study, after applying the time filter (2005–2025), 1,834 publications were selected. After eliminating duplicates and technical errors, 1,702 publications were analyzed using the Bibliometrix (RStudio) package. As a result of the analysis, there was a steady increase in publication activity: in 2006, only 9 articles were published, and in 2024, their number reached 203. The most productive period falls on the years after 2020. As a result of co-occurrence analysis, three main thematic clusters were identified: (1) historical, linguistic, and structural direction (historical linguistics, etymology, semantics), (2) applied and literary onomastics (translation), and (3) anthroponymic and cultural aspects (first names, anthroponomastics).   

References

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Anderson, J. M. (2007). The grammar of names. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297412.001.0001

Brixhe, C. (2010). Linguistic diversity in Asia Minor during the empire: Koine and non-Greek languages. In E. J. Bakker (Ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language (pp. 228–252). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317398.ch16

Clarysse, W., & Paganini, M. (2009). Theophoric personal names in Graeco-Roman Egypt. Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete, 55(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/APF.2009.68

Danesi, M. (2011). What's in a brand name? A note on the onomastics of brand naming. Names, 59(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311X13082331190119

Depauw, M., & Clarysse, W. (2013). How Christian was fourth century Egypt? Onomastic perspectives on conversion. Vigiliae Christianae, 67(4), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700720-12341144

Francfort, H. P., & Tremblay, X. (2010). Marhaši et la civilisation de l'Oxus. Iranica Antiqua, 45, 51–224. https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.45.0.2047119

Kenakin, T. P. (2008). Pharmacological onomastics: What's in a name? British Journal of Pharmacology, 153(3), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707407

Kirk, S. (2021). Sticks and stones: The naming of global talent. Work, Employment and Society, 35(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020922337

Li, S., Kit, C., & Cheng, L. (2024). Unveiling the landscape of onomastics from 1972 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis. Names, 72(3), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2024.2576

Matei-Popescu, F., & Dana, D. (2009). Soldats d'origine dace dans les diplomes militaires. Chiron, 39, 209–256. https://doi.org/10.34780/cn9b-4b3c

Mateos, P., & Tucker, K. (2008). Forenames and surnames in Spain in 2004. Names, 56(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1179/175622708X332860

Mensah, E. O. (2015). Frog, where are you?: The ethnopragmatics of Ibibio death prevention names. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 27(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2014.976545

Motschenbacher, H. (2020). Corpus linguistic onomastics: A plea for a corpus-based investigation of names. Names, 68(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2020.1731240

Mouton, A., Rutherford, I., & Yakubovich, I. (Eds.). (2013). Luwian identities. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253414

Neidorf, L. (2013). The dating of Widsið and the study of Germanic antiquity. Neophilologus, 97(1), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-012-9308-2

Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065

Petrushka, A., Komova, M., & Fedushko, S. (2020). Scientific content: Language expansion in bibliometric databases. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2654, 265–276. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2654/paper30.pdf (DOI отсутствует)

Rayson, P., Reinhold, A., Butler, J., Donaldson, C., Gregory, I., & Taylor, J. (2017). A deeply annotated testbed for geographical text analysis: The corpus of lake district writing. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3149858.3149865

0 | 0

Downloads

Published

13.03.2026

How to Cite

Rustemova, G., & Orynkhanova, G. (2026). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ONOMASTICS: THEMATIC AREAS AND RESEARCH DYNAMICS (2005-2025. Language and Literature: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2026-5-1-88-103

Issue

Section

LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES